Thursday, May 31, 2012

research paper Draft

      When you hear about the stories of St. Joan of Arc, the first thing that comes to mind is the fact that she was an outspoken woman from the country of France who was a warrior saint and advocate for the Catholic Church and all political independence. Joan were her heart on her sleeve and made no apologies about how she felt. George Bernard Shaw’s play Saint Joan: a chronicle play in six scenes depicts how her overwhelming desire for independence within her country lead to her alienating her superiors and inevitably lead to her downfall. One could say she and fellow Philosopher, Socrates have a lot in common as far as there need to spread the knowledge for the circumstances they were under. The Price of having an opinion of the way thing were prove to be dire for St. Joan, but like Socrates it was a big price to pay in order to bring change to her nation.        
      Joan of Arc was not your typical girl for her time. Born in 1412 in Vosges, Joan was a warrior and was considered to be unusual to her respected superiors during the middle ages (Shaw 4). She was not one to be behind the bush when it came upon expressing her feelings, especially when it came to religion. According to G.B. Shaw’s Saint Joan, Joan was “professed” and “Pious Catholic” (Shaw 4). From what I gather, Shaw used this very much throughout the play as a way to act out how passionate she was about her beliefs and evidently her love for the country of France and how desperately she wanted her country to be independent.                                
    G.B. Shaw makes a point on how she somewhat is comparable to that of a Socrates, one of the most famous philosophical figures of his generation. In many ways both were very keen on the topic at hand when it comes to expressing their opinion certain matters and due to that fact that people were taking to liking to Joan and Socrates it would lead to tragic endings to both there lives.                            
    People taking a like to Joan and her ideas of independence for a nation were like Socrates spreading word that the philosophy of his fellow superiors were like Socrates spreading word that the philosophy of his fellow superiors were wrong and seem like defiant threat but it didn’t feel that way to Joan. As stated in one of the essays by G.B. Shaw in his play Saint Joan, Joan was “Too young and rustically and inexperience to have any such arts”(Shaw 4). As to reassess, Joan tunnel vision to get her message across left her obliviously to the situation she was causing which would wake up people to her own capabilities.                                                                                                                  
   The comparison that Author G.B. Shaw is able to draw is a very enticing one in that both question what was going on around them and were not afraid to address their situations head on. As Robin Waterfield points out how Socrates, “discovered that none of the so-called experts really deserved their reputation” and were “incapable… to their areas of expertise” (The Historical Socrates 24). Socrates seem to believe that he was the  wisest of the wise and from what it looked like rub some of his other fellow people the wrong way.                                                
     The hatred for Joan in the play becomes more apparent as the play progresses. The people of London seem to have felt she was a threat to them and there way of life so they felt that she had to be eliminated. According to Shaw’s interpretation in his play the Archbishop let her know that if she continued to talk this nonsense she was talking than she was going to be abandoned by the church, along with losing the respect and admiration from her fellow military soldiers and the king would have know reason to help her if was In of assistance ( Saint Joan Scene V). From what I read I the play I believe Shaw comparison with Socrates to be in many ways is dead on accurate as far as their approach into providing knowledge and their fellow superiors not taking a liking to them trying to change there way of life, so they took matters into there own hands by holding both accountable.                                            
     Like Joan, Socrates was held accountable for his action of trying use their word to get the youth on his side by telling them that what is going on in this city is not right. Socrates felt like he was being treated unfairly by the people, according to Socrates by Kraut Richard, Socrates felt like he was “being prosecuted for was his antidemocratic associations and ideas” (Socrates 8). Feeling like he was being treated unfairly was the least of his problems, like Joan of Arc it was his “alleged religious unorthodoxy” (Socrates 8) that got the attention people and was “deeply worrying to his prosecutors and jurors” (Socrates 8). Like Joan of Arc it seems as though there thoughts and beliefs weight heavily into the decisions of their superiors and it seem like though on the surface what they were suggesting sounded absurd, but if you look closer there premise as to what was going on during their respected times in which they were alive; Socrates in Athens and Joan of Arc in France, they were making an impact that would to change and would not be looked at as if they were crazy.                                
     G.B. Shaw points out that the way Joan would rant about her religion to those that are higher in power than her and they would look at her as if she were out of mind. “God is merciful; the blessed saints…who speak to me ever day [he gapes]…and your name will be remembered for ever as my first helper” (Saint Joan Scene I). In effect the awe of what she was saying in this scene just seem to take people back as if she was being serious and she was apparently and got the attention of people of London. Socrates also had his own view on religion while he was being prosecuted in his trial and would not back down from his views, “Men of Athens, I salute you and hold you dear, but I will obey the god rather than you, and so long I take breath and am able, I will never cease philosophizing” (Richard 13). In effect of Socrates being very passionate on his views you can see where G.B. Shaw saw many of the comparison with Joan and how in his eyes he saw history sort of repeating itself between these two historical figures.                
     The one glaring thing that seems to set these apart as far as the comparison to me happens to be that Joan seemed to not have a clue that she was having a major impact on her people. Shaw would suggest though she was too “Naïve” (Saint Joan 4), she would ultimately stand her ground on her views. Shaw points out in one of his essay that Socrates was forgetting that the impact he was having on man was taking an effect and in his turn on trial felt as if he gave up his freedom of speech and his will to fight. If only Socrates knew his impact he was having as pointed out by  The Philosopher’s Way: Thinking Critically About Profound Ideas: a Text With Readings, he was helping young people to “think for themselves” (Chaffe 63) and “determine their value and truth”(Chaffe 63). In reiterate both of these historical figures just seem have different approaches as far handling their situations but at the same time had an impact on how G.B. Shaw wanted this play to be view by the pubic.                            
     Assessing all that G.B. Shaw pointed out, the case should be made that Socrates had a great influence on Joan and how he wanted his story about her to be interpreted. One could say that there approach and style are alike in that they were very outspoken on there views they made valid points, while other would point out that Joan fought for her own free will and Socrates was reserved and maybe arrogant, you can’t deny that there stories stand true to who they are and what they stand for and that is getting one to think and don’t be afraid question what is going.

Monday, May 7, 2012

Blog 4


              The messenger delivers me good new. This idea of killing the king is becoming more real And even more real… I Call upon all ghostly figures. Make me more evil. Fill my body with nothing but evil, leave no emotions so I can do this deed. Make My Blood evil from head to toe. Leave me with no sense of compassion. With no remorse left in my soul. Leave me with only cruelty and deadly thoughts, no peace at all. Come and take my whole body evil spirits Take away my Femininity and replace it with evil and hatred. I will do whatever it takes even if I cannot see it. As I wait for evil to take me over. Then cover me with a black cloth and place it on my coffin as rest in hell don’t let my sharp knife see this wound also don’t let the heavens see the evil that I am about to unleash. Then I Cry “Hold, Hold”.                          - Lady Macbeth Act 1, Scene 5                                                                               

Friday, April 20, 2012

BLOG 3

The first blog in which i read was by sue kwon and I was very impress how she was able to explain the role of woman in society in Ancient Greece. I learned plenty on how woman were treated in society during this time and how they were affected by it. Sue was able to explain both plays, Antigone by Sophocles and Medea by Euripides very clearly and was able to mention the critical points where woman in this time in society were treated. As I was reading the post I couldn’t help but notice the how she also put her own take on the double standards between the women and the men, it is always good hear an opinion from someone writing their own piece and instead of the piece being just factual. Personally what I learned from her is that when you are writing a piece when it comes to literature is to try to keep it and clear as possible and try not to get too broad on the topic at hand. The professor wouldn’t want me to do that, and then they’ll see that I’m all over the place. Of course also have clearer thesis statements also I feel I get in depth with it when it should just go straight to the point plain and simple. I feel the greatest strength in the paper I just wrote was that I often know how to transition from one paragraph fairly well and need to improve that but be a little more clearer in that aspect if I want to get a better grade in this course. I feel that it was not put together well and I wish I would have taken better care of it more and revised it and look through my own errors. If I were to do anything better on the next assignment it would be to use more evidence to back up claims on the topic, and choose a better choice of words this way I won’t set myself up for disappointment on the next paper which will be given very soon. Last but most certainly not least I need to correct my grammar mistakes on the topic because no one is going to do it for me other than myself. Overall I feel I learned immensely how to improve my paper for the next time it is assign to the class I will be more prepared to really dig deep and get a better grade because I really motivated to rectify the mistakes I made on the last paper.

Thursday, April 5, 2012

Blog 2

Females often aren’t the focal point in major stories and the same can be said for women in society 50 years ago. Though, dating back to the days of the ancient Greece woman were finally getting the recognition and credit they rightfully deserve. The role of the female has immensely change and Greek plays laid the foundation for opportunities they have today.When you look at the role females in a typical manner it is often that they stay in the background without a voice of an opinion, doesn’t stand up for herself, overly emotional and is often inferior to her male counterpart which laughable in the society we live in today. In the play “Antigone” by Sophocles, the Greek drama illustrates the roles of two women, Antigone and her sister Ismene. Ismene displays the typical woman very well in this role in this play, “ I do not dishonor them; but I am powerless to act against the citizens”(Antigone lines 68-69). Also with this, “At least don’t reveal what you do to anyone; keep it secret, and will do the same”(Antigone lines 74-75). Reading between the lines you can see that Ismene was very passive, more of a follower and very inferior in that respect. We can see the total opposite of that in her sister, Antigone.Antigone in many ways is the renaissance woman in this story. She defines everything the woman role is now, strong willed, passionate, outspoken, loyal and independent. You can see all this being displayed within the play, “You can hold on to that excuse; but I will go to raise a burial mound for the brother I Love”(Antigone lines 70-71) and “No! Shout it out! You will be much more hateful for your silence, if you don’t proclaim it to everyone!”(Antigone lines 76-77). As indicated you can see how Antigone is and her contributions to how a woman’s role in society has change for the better.You also see how methodical, smart and tenacious a woman can be even in the times when Sophocles and Euripides were writing these Greek Tragedies. It’s no surprise today that women that you see today are in the position with high esteem professions like professors, lawyers, doctors and teachers. Medea really holds true to this in many ways. In “Medea and the other plays” written by Euripides you can see she use her strong traits as woman but in the wrong frame of mind. As indicated in the play you can really see her mindset as a woman, “Allow me to stay…let me think…in life for my children…show them some pity!…I do not care what happens to me…it’s my children…suffering children I weep for”(Medea lines 340-346). From those lines one indicate she seems very caring also but she is smart and very premeditating in her scheming and plotting. The development in this character was way beyond it’s year sort of like a pioneer in that respect. We all can appreciate the role in which woman play today in this modern day of society. Whether it be domestic house wife, artist, doctor, business woman, you name it the female has done it and the role in which they play can now be traced back to Greek plays. This foundation can greatly be appreciated now and say it has paved the way for those benefit from its roots.                  

Thursday, March 22, 2012

BLOG 1

Part XIV and the concepts of how the poet uses fear and pity to create a spectacle of the within the tragedy. For those just use spectacular means just to use them for their own gain just dont get what tragedy is and wht it is about and how it is use to develop pity and fear so the reader can appreciated. This is something that just cant be demanded because to me it has to fit the mold of what a tragedy is suppose to do. Tragedy must come from either friends or enemies engaging with one another. If it came from to enemies than you really wont feel the state of pity. (Ex: brother intends to harm, brother, father, mother of the son)                                                                                                       

Thursday, March 15, 2012

intro

Hello My Name is Sean Ulloa this is my blog be free to exercise your opinion on my blog